<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Welcome Aboard!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/27/welcome-aboard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/27/welcome-aboard/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Danny H.</title>
		<link>http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/27/welcome-aboard/#comment-2520</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 19:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foxforum.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-2520</guid>
		<description>*Shaking my head in disbelief at Scott*

Scott, you just mentioned one of the primary problems I have with most of the cultures and religions that came out of Northern Africa (Christianity and Islam ) and Southern Europe (Greco-Roman):  That is the innate misogyny of those cultures.   

We of the Northern Faiths have always recognized our womenfolk as being humans, as having as many rights as men, and of being able to be responsible for their own actions to our Gods and our Ancestors.  Yes, all of our actions as men or women affect our families' orlog, and are the concern of the whole family, but each of us are responsible for our own actions.   We feel no need to treat "the little woman" as being unable to take care of themselves.  But then again, it was Freyja Eriksdottir who reminded the men of Vinland what it meant to be a Norseman when the Skraelings attacked.  Even pregnant, she ripped off her bodice, beat her bare breast with a sword and faced off the attackers herself scaring them to the point that they broke off the attack.  

I'll take the heathen ways over yours any day.

Danny</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Shaking my head in disbelief at Scott*</p>
<p>Scott, you just mentioned one of the primary problems I have with most of the cultures and religions that came out of Northern Africa (Christianity and Islam ) and Southern Europe (Greco-Roman):  That is the innate misogyny of those cultures.   </p>
<p>We of the Northern Faiths have always recognized our womenfolk as being humans, as having as many rights as men, and of being able to be responsible for their own actions to our Gods and our Ancestors.  Yes, all of our actions as men or women affect our families&#8217; orlog, and are the concern of the whole family, but each of us are responsible for our own actions.   We feel no need to treat &#8220;the little woman&#8221; as being unable to take care of themselves.  But then again, it was Freyja Eriksdottir who reminded the men of Vinland what it meant to be a Norseman when the Skraelings attacked.  Even pregnant, she ripped off her bodice, beat her bare breast with a sword and faced off the attackers herself scaring them to the point that they broke off the attack.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll take the heathen ways over yours any day.</p>
<p>Danny</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madeline from north carolina</title>
		<link>http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/27/welcome-aboard/#comment-2387</link>
		<dc:creator>madeline from north carolina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foxforum.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-2387</guid>
		<description>Scott, 

I read your post concerning women, and I will tell you, my husband doesn't "Train" me, I am not a dog or a horse. And I am responsible for myself, and I will answer to God for what sins i commit, not my husband.

This is one reason I stayed away from church for so long, if I heard "You can't do that, you're a girl!" one more time, I would have gladly hit that person with whatever I could find. 

I didn't want to be a priest, a pastor, or a housewife. I didn't want to spend my life raising children, cleaning house, or being someone's "wife". I wanted to join the military and see the world. When I tried to join the military, there were so many restrictions placed on me, I just gave up. I went to college and became a teacher. 

When I met my husband, I told him he wasn't my daddy, I didn't need him to teach me the way I should go, or any of that. I fear a great many women have stood by and missed out on life because of attitudes like this. 

I agree with very little the liberals but forth, but I am adamantly with the feminists on this. I do NOT agree with abortion, nor any of the other junk the liberals spout. But equality, I do agree with, and as soon as we ALL are recognized as humans, instead of male or female, the better off we all will all be.

madeline
shelby, nc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, </p>
<p>I read your post concerning women, and I will tell you, my husband doesn&#8217;t &#8220;Train&#8221; me, I am not a dog or a horse. And I am responsible for myself, and I will answer to God for what sins i commit, not my husband.</p>
<p>This is one reason I stayed away from church for so long, if I heard &#8220;You can&#8217;t do that, you&#8217;re a girl!&#8221; one more time, I would have gladly hit that person with whatever I could find. </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t want to be a priest, a pastor, or a housewife. I didn&#8217;t want to spend my life raising children, cleaning house, or being someone&#8217;s &#8220;wife&#8221;. I wanted to join the military and see the world. When I tried to join the military, there were so many restrictions placed on me, I just gave up. I went to college and became a teacher. </p>
<p>When I met my husband, I told him he wasn&#8217;t my daddy, I didn&#8217;t need him to teach me the way I should go, or any of that. I fear a great many women have stood by and missed out on life because of attitudes like this. </p>
<p>I agree with very little the liberals but forth, but I am adamantly with the feminists on this. I do NOT agree with abortion, nor any of the other junk the liberals spout. But equality, I do agree with, and as soon as we ALL are recognized as humans, instead of male or female, the better off we all will all be.</p>
<p>madeline<br />
shelby, nc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dinene</title>
		<link>http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/27/welcome-aboard/#comment-2377</link>
		<dc:creator>Dinene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 12:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foxforum.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-2377</guid>
		<description>Hi Father J,

I am a 42 year old gal who lives in Central Pennsylvania. I love photography, animals and travel.  I attended the lutheran church most of my life.  I love your blog. I really enjoyed reading your entry on Barrack Obama. I don't like to sound suspicious or negative but I've often wondered if he has a hidden agenda. I too can't imagine how a person can go to the same church for 20 years and listen to the same person and not be affected by his words and opinions. If I attended a church and the preacher talked racism and hate, I would leave. I wouldn't sit there for 20 years and listen to it. There's no excuse for hatred. We all need to learn to love each other and start living by the ten commandments.  God Bless you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Father J,</p>
<p>I am a 42 year old gal who lives in Central Pennsylvania. I love photography, animals and travel.  I attended the lutheran church most of my life.  I love your blog. I really enjoyed reading your entry on Barrack Obama. I don&#8217;t like to sound suspicious or negative but I&#8217;ve often wondered if he has a hidden agenda. I too can&#8217;t imagine how a person can go to the same church for 20 years and listen to the same person and not be affected by his words and opinions. If I attended a church and the preacher talked racism and hate, I would leave. I wouldn&#8217;t sit there for 20 years and listen to it. There&#8217;s no excuse for hatred. We all need to learn to love each other and start living by the ten commandments.  God Bless you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane from Nv.</title>
		<link>http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/27/welcome-aboard/#comment-2291</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane from Nv.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 01:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foxforum.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-2291</guid>
		<description>Dear Fr. Morris...

 If you do read all of these posts? I am very concerned about Obama's ability to have so many people who have been friends of his, including eastern men, who [may be terror sympathizers] who may be funnling cash to terrorists. [Do I believe Obama is personally aiding terror?] I do not know.
 I do know that there are millions of people who are able to act a certain way in public, but then are practicing strange beliefs behind closed doors. I hope with all my soul, Obama is NOT such a person who would make his way into the white house so that he could make it easy for our enemies to get inside of our Government after he appoints his "friends" who are NOT who he thought they were for the 20 plus years he associated with these some 4 - 6 questionable people he has direct ties to.

   Including the Now CONVICTED slum-loard of Chicago, the openly "hate filled preacher" and all who preach from that particular pulpit - including a white preacher who sounded like he was born and raised in Watt's California! AND HE'S WHITE! and he felt ENTITLED TO SCREAM FROM THE PULPIT with all of the same "hate filled" nasty behavior as the Churches undecided retired REV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Fr. Morris&#8230;</p>
<p> If you do read all of these posts? I am very concerned about Obama&#8217;s ability to have so many people who have been friends of his, including eastern men, who [may be terror sympathizers] who may be funnling cash to terrorists. [Do I believe Obama is personally aiding terror?] I do not know.<br />
 I do know that there are millions of people who are able to act a certain way in public, but then are practicing strange beliefs behind closed doors. I hope with all my soul, Obama is NOT such a person who would make his way into the white house so that he could make it easy for our enemies to get inside of our Government after he appoints his &#8220;friends&#8221; who are NOT who he thought they were for the 20 plus years he associated with these some 4 - 6 questionable people he has direct ties to.</p>
<p>   Including the Now CONVICTED slum-loard of Chicago, the openly &#8220;hate filled preacher&#8221; and all who preach from that particular pulpit - including a white preacher who sounded like he was born and raised in Watt&#8217;s California! AND HE&#8217;S WHITE! and he felt ENTITLED TO SCREAM FROM THE PULPIT with all of the same &#8220;hate filled&#8221; nasty behavior as the Churches undecided retired REV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LauraC</title>
		<link>http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/27/welcome-aboard/#comment-1406</link>
		<dc:creator>LauraC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 04:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foxforum.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-1406</guid>
		<description>In regard to Father Jonathan's question....are we making too big a thing out of Senator Obama’s "churchgate"?.....Absolutely not.
I believe it's most important for us to closely look at Senator Obama or anyone running for political office, including their religious beliefs.  I firmly believe a person's religious beliefs influence their lives, and therefore their actions.  Senator Obama has clearly shown his beliefs in misguided spiritual teachings, so much so that he applauds their efforts to refuel hatred and mistrust in the common people.   Very dangerous thinking......a president is suppose to unite people, not divide them.
Take care,
Laura</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regard to Father Jonathan&#8217;s question&#8230;.are we making too big a thing out of Senator Obama’s &#8220;churchgate&#8221;?&#8230;..Absolutely not.<br />
I believe it&#8217;s most important for us to closely look at Senator Obama or anyone running for political office, including their religious beliefs.  I firmly believe a person&#8217;s religious beliefs influence their lives, and therefore their actions.  Senator Obama has clearly shown his beliefs in misguided spiritual teachings, so much so that he applauds their efforts to refuel hatred and mistrust in the common people.   Very dangerous thinking&#8230;&#8230;a president is suppose to unite people, not divide them.<br />
Take care,<br />
Laura</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/27/welcome-aboard/#comment-1180</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foxforum.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-1180</guid>
		<description>Comment by Joe 
May 30th, 2008 at 10:37 am 
I noted today that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (aka Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office, aka Holy Office of the Inquisition) issued its latest decree concerning the ordination of women. It provides automatic excommunication for anyone involved in the ordination of women, and confirms the church’s position as perhaps the most sexist institution in Western civilization. Not only that, it dismisses half the world’s population as second class and inferior.


Joe - I think you are way off base here.  The decree to not allow women to be priests has NOTHING to do with thinking half the world's population are second class and inferior.  The Catholic Church has several large orders of Sisters/Nuns that devote their life to God and are just as honored and supported as the orders of Monks/Priests in the Catholic church.  There are several women that have been made Saints, Mother Theresa is the newest! A woman!!Hello....

Do not equate the restriction on women becoming priests, something even the Jews did not permit until recent times, as being sexist.  In fact, God commands that a man be the head of his household. Responsible for the actions of his wife, children, employees, and himself.  When I go to heaven, I will have to answer not only for my sins but theirs because it is my Duty to God to train them right, hold them accountable to HIS will and Law, and discipline them when they disobey God's Word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by Joe<br />
May 30th, 2008 at 10:37 am<br />
I noted today that the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (aka Supreme Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office, aka Holy Office of the Inquisition) issued its latest decree concerning the ordination of women. It provides automatic excommunication for anyone involved in the ordination of women, and confirms the church’s position as perhaps the most sexist institution in Western civilization. Not only that, it dismisses half the world’s population as second class and inferior.</p>
<p>Joe - I think you are way off base here.  The decree to not allow women to be priests has NOTHING to do with thinking half the world&#8217;s population are second class and inferior.  The Catholic Church has several large orders of Sisters/Nuns that devote their life to God and are just as honored and supported as the orders of Monks/Priests in the Catholic church.  There are several women that have been made Saints, Mother Theresa is the newest! A woman!!Hello&#8230;.</p>
<p>Do not equate the restriction on women becoming priests, something even the Jews did not permit until recent times, as being sexist.  In fact, God commands that a man be the head of his household. Responsible for the actions of his wife, children, employees, and himself.  When I go to heaven, I will have to answer not only for my sins but theirs because it is my Duty to God to train them right, hold them accountable to HIS will and Law, and discipline them when they disobey God&#8217;s Word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/27/welcome-aboard/#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 17:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foxforum.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-1175</guid>
		<description>Comment by terrence green 
May 30th, 2008 at 10:14 am 
I attended Immaculat Conception Church in suburban Philadelphia during the 50’s being raised with beautiful songs sung in Latin and English and, of course, the Mass being recited in Latin; I miss it. Do you think that priests will ever be able to marry, as the Orthodox Christians insist their priests do? I have not read (in either the old or new testament) any reason why they should not be able to. If anything, I think it would help with the shortage of priests, especially in America. St. Paul wrote (and it is God’s word) that it is best to remain single, however he realized that not everyone can do this–don’t you think this should apply to priests too?
Terry

Terry...there is nothing in the Bible about priests not marrying.  They did in the Jewish tradtition and they did in the beginning of the Christian churchs and Catholic church.  The problem came about in the Dark Ages as the Papacy was split and the sale of indulgences was rampant.  There came a time when the Bishops and high Church officials were in collution with the monarchs and they married their children off to seal deals and make political alliances.  A Pope (forget which one, Father should know) banned the sale of indulgences and also banned the marriage of priests from that point on to prevent the craving of political power over the Power of God and following in the teachings of the Church.  It has held ever since, I believe the ban was in place by the late 1100's or 1400's, I forget which.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment by terrence green<br />
May 30th, 2008 at 10:14 am<br />
I attended Immaculat Conception Church in suburban Philadelphia during the 50’s being raised with beautiful songs sung in Latin and English and, of course, the Mass being recited in Latin; I miss it. Do you think that priests will ever be able to marry, as the Orthodox Christians insist their priests do? I have not read (in either the old or new testament) any reason why they should not be able to. If anything, I think it would help with the shortage of priests, especially in America. St. Paul wrote (and it is God’s word) that it is best to remain single, however he realized that not everyone can do this–don’t you think this should apply to priests too?<br />
Terry</p>
<p>Terry&#8230;there is nothing in the Bible about priests not marrying.  They did in the Jewish tradtition and they did in the beginning of the Christian churchs and Catholic church.  The problem came about in the Dark Ages as the Papacy was split and the sale of indulgences was rampant.  There came a time when the Bishops and high Church officials were in collution with the monarchs and they married their children off to seal deals and make political alliances.  A Pope (forget which one, Father should know) banned the sale of indulgences and also banned the marriage of priests from that point on to prevent the craving of political power over the Power of God and following in the teachings of the Church.  It has held ever since, I believe the ban was in place by the late 1100&#8217;s or 1400&#8217;s, I forget which.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/27/welcome-aboard/#comment-1095</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foxforum.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-1095</guid>
		<description>"Oh, and one more thing. Please, if you would, take a moment now and make your first post. Without revealing your full name, tell us a bit about yourselves, where you are from, what you think about what I’ve explained above, and your suggestions of how to make this a helpful community for you. "

Well, I usually do not post under my real name but for this and for Father Jonathan, I will.  I am a Roman Catholic by birth and by choice, I was confirmed at age 14 because I wanted to and I believed in the teachings of the Church, I still do regardless of what some members or clergy do or have done.  Currently I attend a nondenominational christian church that just happens to be 40% Catholic by make up since there is no real local Catholic church to us and my wife is simply Christian.

I am 36, father of 2 by birth, 3 more by marriage.  I am well educated, not just by schools but life, I have a BS in Physics from UCLA and an MA Ed from Pepperdine University.  I am born and breed in Southern California from a Kennedy Democrat Roman Catholic family.  However, I grew up in the Reagan years and the man and his life and work have had a profound effect on my thinking.  I am a Reagan Conservative for life.  My brothers, sister, and I were taught from a young age personal responsibility, independence, and strength of convictions.

I found Father Jonathan's writings over a year ago and since then have read every back dated blog entry I could.  There is hardly an instant where I do not agree with his analysis of a situation.  He is a Roman Catholic of the same vein as I, spiritual-religious yet with a high analytical logical thought process tempered by reality.  I look forward to following and supporting his career as he might one day by my Pope.  I believe he would make a great successor to Pope Benedict XVI in 20 years or so.

I believe this forum discusion can only help the life mission of Pope John Paul II, the reunification of the Catholic Church, Anglican, and other denominations under one banner.  It is also a life mission that I feel God has placed in my life with a dream that rattles in my mind and has continued to since watching John Paul's funeral a few years ago.

I talk straight, I don't pull punches.  If you are going to comment make sure your point can be backed by more than just emotional reasons.  Facts, truth, logic are immutiable as are the ethics, moral, and values that God has granted His people on Earth.  We are all His chirldren, no matter how disobedient we have become.  

God Bless and LETS GET READY TO RUMBLE!!!!
=)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and one more thing. Please, if you would, take a moment now and make your first post. Without revealing your full name, tell us a bit about yourselves, where you are from, what you think about what I’ve explained above, and your suggestions of how to make this a helpful community for you. &#8221;</p>
<p>Well, I usually do not post under my real name but for this and for Father Jonathan, I will.  I am a Roman Catholic by birth and by choice, I was confirmed at age 14 because I wanted to and I believed in the teachings of the Church, I still do regardless of what some members or clergy do or have done.  Currently I attend a nondenominational christian church that just happens to be 40% Catholic by make up since there is no real local Catholic church to us and my wife is simply Christian.</p>
<p>I am 36, father of 2 by birth, 3 more by marriage.  I am well educated, not just by schools but life, I have a BS in Physics from UCLA and an MA Ed from Pepperdine University.  I am born and breed in Southern California from a Kennedy Democrat Roman Catholic family.  However, I grew up in the Reagan years and the man and his life and work have had a profound effect on my thinking.  I am a Reagan Conservative for life.  My brothers, sister, and I were taught from a young age personal responsibility, independence, and strength of convictions.</p>
<p>I found Father Jonathan&#8217;s writings over a year ago and since then have read every back dated blog entry I could.  There is hardly an instant where I do not agree with his analysis of a situation.  He is a Roman Catholic of the same vein as I, spiritual-religious yet with a high analytical logical thought process tempered by reality.  I look forward to following and supporting his career as he might one day by my Pope.  I believe he would make a great successor to Pope Benedict XVI in 20 years or so.</p>
<p>I believe this forum discusion can only help the life mission of Pope John Paul II, the reunification of the Catholic Church, Anglican, and other denominations under one banner.  It is also a life mission that I feel God has placed in my life with a dream that rattles in my mind and has continued to since watching John Paul&#8217;s funeral a few years ago.</p>
<p>I talk straight, I don&#8217;t pull punches.  If you are going to comment make sure your point can be backed by more than just emotional reasons.  Facts, truth, logic are immutiable as are the ethics, moral, and values that God has granted His people on Earth.  We are all His chirldren, no matter how disobedient we have become.  </p>
<p>God Bless and LETS GET READY TO RUMBLE!!!!<br />
=)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Miller</title>
		<link>http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/27/welcome-aboard/#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foxforum.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>Having an interactive site is a &lt;B&gt;great&lt;/B&gt; idea!  Judging by the number of comments thus far posted, and the absence of he crudity so often found, I think it will be a smashing success. 

Although an Agnostic/Atheist, I have read your column for quite some time, and always find it enjoyable.  I don't always agree with you, but often do. 

For such interest as it may hold, here is a &lt;a HREF="blogcritics.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;link&lt;/A&gt; to a site on which I frequently post articles and comments. I have a feeling that many of the articles and comments -- which are sometimes more enlightening than the articles -- there might be right up your alley.

One small suggestion: since your site permits HTML code, it would be very helpful to have a "preview" button, because sometimes the code is confusing and people forget to close tabs.  This problem can generally be prevented by allowing a preview.

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having an interactive site is a <b>great</b> idea!  Judging by the number of comments thus far posted, and the absence of he crudity so often found, I think it will be a smashing success. </p>
<p>Although an Agnostic/Atheist, I have read your column for quite some time, and always find it enjoyable.  I don&#8217;t always agree with you, but often do. </p>
<p>For such interest as it may hold, here is a <a HREF="blogcritics.org" rel="nofollow">link</a> to a site on which I frequently post articles and comments. I have a feeling that many of the articles and comments &#8212; which are sometimes more enlightening than the articles &#8212; there might be right up your alley.</p>
<p>One small suggestion: since your site permits HTML code, it would be very helpful to have a &#8220;preview&#8221; button, because sometimes the code is confusing and people forget to close tabs.  This problem can generally be prevented by allowing a preview.</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Bryan</title>
		<link>http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/05/27/welcome-aboard/#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://foxforum.wordpress.com/?p=132#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>Father Jonathon, I recently met you in Tulsa, OK.  I really enjoyed that night.  I believe, regardless of religious beliefs, that we need to go back to the set of rules I believe were given by God.  These rules, the Ten Commandments, are also common sense rules for life.  They aren't bad and if we all lived by them we would all be better off.  For example, most believe murder is wrong.  Also, stealing and adultery can't be justified.  Oh what a better world we would have if we respected life this way.  Thanks so much for this forum, Jim Bryan--Tulsa, OK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Father Jonathon, I recently met you in Tulsa, OK.  I really enjoyed that night.  I believe, regardless of religious beliefs, that we need to go back to the set of rules I believe were given by God.  These rules, the Ten Commandments, are also common sense rules for life.  They aren&#8217;t bad and if we all lived by them we would all be better off.  For example, most believe murder is wrong.  Also, stealing and adultery can&#8217;t be justified.  Oh what a better world we would have if we respected life this way.  Thanks so much for this forum, Jim Bryan&#8211;Tulsa, OK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
